US outlet Radio Free Asia closes Hong Kong office over security law fears

Chief Executive John Lee (2nd L) arrives at the Legislative Council after the conclusion of the readings of the Article 23 National Security Law, in Hong Kong on March 19, 2024. Hong Kong’s legislature unanimously passed a new national security law on March 19, introducing penalties such as life imprisonment for crimes related to treason and insurrection, and up to 20 years’ jail for the theft of state secrets.   — The US news outlet Radio Free Asia (RFA) said Friday it had closed its Hong Kong office over staff safety concerns after the city enacted a controversial new national security law.(Photo by Peter PARKS / AFP)

WASHINGTON, March 29, 2024 (AFP) – The US news outlet Radio Free Asia (RFA) said Friday it had closed its Hong Kong office over staff safety concerns after the city enacted a controversial new national security law.

The Chinese finance hub last week brought into force a homegrown security law — commonly known as Article 23 — that introduced tough penalties for crimes such as treason, espionage and external interference.

The law, which prompted swift criticism by several democracies and rights organizations, will work in tandem with a 2020 Beijing-imposed version that has silenced nearly all dissent in Hong Kong and seen nearly 300 people arrested since its enactment.

RFA president and CEO Bay Fang said in a statement that the company no longer had full-time staff in Hong Kong and has closed its physical office, citing “concerns about the safety of RFA staff and reporters.”

“Actions by Hong Kong authorities, including referring to RFA as a ‘foreign force,’ raise serious questions about our ability to operate in safety with the enactment of Article 23,” Fang said.

A Hong Kong government spokesperson declined to comment on “operational decisions of individual organizations,” but said authorities “strongly disapprove of and condemn all scaremongering and smearing remarks” in relation to the national security law.

“To single out Hong Kong and suggest that journalists would only experience concerns when operating here but not in other countries would be grossly biased, if not outrageous,” the spokesperson told AFP on Friday.

Hong Kong’s security chief Chris Tang slammed RFA last month for “smearing” Article 23 when it reported that some new offenses would target the media.

RFA’s article had quoted criticism of the law.

When asked whether RFA had breached the law, Tang later said that he wanted to alert the public to wrong information peddled by “foreign forces.”

The Washington-headquartered news outlet focuses on coverage inside countries with media restrictions. It is funded by the US Congress but with a mandate of editorial independence.

US Representative Greg Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, voiced alarm over RFA’s departure, saying the outlet had been a “rare source of independent news coming out of Hong Kong despite facing unrelenting pressure and harassment.”

“The closure of RFA’s bureau in Hong Kong, after 28 years, is a stark reminder of how brazenly Beijing has extinguished Hong Kong’s autonomy,” Meeks said.

RFA opened its Hong Kong office in 1996 and has operated as a private news organization with editorial independence, according to Fang’s statement Friday.

Citing its “frontline status,” Fang said that “RFA will shift to using a different journalistic model reserved for closed media environments.”

RFA is the first foreign media outlet to publicly announce its closure in Hong Kong since the national security law came into effect on March 23.

Hong Kong officials have defended the new security legislation as necessary to “plug” security loopholes.

Authorities also cited a “constitutional responsibility” to create it under the Basic Law, Hong Kong’s mini-constitution since its handover from Britain to China in 1997.