A U.S. appeals court on Monday (May 18) reversed part of the $930 million (USD) verdict that Apple Inc won in 2012 against Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, saying the iPhone maker’s trade dress could not be protected.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld the patent infringement violations found by the jury. But the $382 million awarded for trade dress dilution will have to be reconsidered by the lower court. Trade dress is a legal term for a trademark on the way a product is packaged or presented.
In a highly anticipated ruling stemming from the global smartphone wars, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., upheld the patent infringement violations found by a federal jury in a court in San Jose, California, as well as the damages awarded for those violations.
Out of the $930 million judgment against Samsung, the appeals court ordered the court in San Jose to reconsider the $382 million portion awarded for trade dress dilution.
Trade dress is a legal term for a trademark on the way a product is packaged or presented. As part of its case, Apple had accused Samsung of diluting its brand and connection with customers by copying the look of its phones.
The appeals court said the features Apple sought to trademark were not eligible for this kind of legal protection because they are essential to the functioning of the phone. To grant such protection would give Apple a monopoly on these features forever, the court said.
The 2012 trial was widely watched between the two smartphone titans. The jury found Samsung violated several Apple patents, including those related to iPhone’s design and appearance.
Apple was eventually awarded $930 million in damages, but failed in 2013 to convince U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh to ban the sale of the infringing Samsung phones, which are now no longer on the market.
REUTERS
